The required contents
Every matrimonial petition follows a settled structure, and each part does a job.
The sections that fix the format
Where to file: Section 19. A Hindu Marriage Act petition can be filed where the marriage was solemnised, where the respondent lives, where the couple last lived together, or, if the wife is the petitioner, where she lives on the date of filing. Picking the right court is a pleading point, not a formality.
What it must say: Section 20. The facts on which relief is claimed must be stated distinctly, and the contents verified in the way a civil plaint is verified.
What the court checks before granting a decree: Section 23. That the petitioner is not taking advantage of their own wrong, that cruelty or adultery was not condoned, that there is no collusion, and that there has been no improper delay. A well-drafted petition answers each of these before the court asks.
The mistakes we most often have to fix
Pleading conclusions instead of facts. "The respondent treated the petitioner with cruelty" is a conclusion. What the court needs is what happened, when, and where.
Omitting reliefs. Custody, maintenance and return of stridhan claimed as afterthoughts are much harder to run than reliefs claimed in the petition itself.
Overstating. Allegations that cannot be proved damage credibility on the allegations that can. Family court judges are experienced at spotting the padded petition.
Getting jurisdiction wrong. A petition filed in the wrong court can be returned, costing months.
The joint petition is a different document
A mutual consent petition is signed by both parties and states that they have been living separately for the required period, that they have not been able to live together, and that they have mutually agreed the marriage should be dissolved.
Its most important part is the settlement: alimony, custody and visitation, property, and the withdrawal of other proceedings. That schedule should be specific enough to be enforced without argument, because a vague settlement clause is one of the very few things that brings a consent divorce back to court.